Phoresia.org

– stripping surfing back down to its most elemental form

Under the Sun

It’s not often that a surf film documents rather than simply portray the surfing lifestyle. Under the Sun is such an example. Filmed, edited, and written by filmmaker Cyrus Sutton, Under the Sun takes an in depth look at two Australian cities that have shaped our current, and sometimes clashing, duality of surfing cultures. There’s the Gold Coast, boasting major surf wear multi-nationals and home to some of the best competitive surfers in the world. And down the road a ways there’s Byron Bay, perhaps best known from early on in the Morning of the Earth, a hippie enclave with locally grown foods and simple living. But Sutton does much more than compare the two cities. In fact, Sutton manages to objectively look at the commodification of modern surf culture, as it exists in both the competitive and “free surfing” world.

Under the Sun - poster

But there is much more to the well executed film. The cinematography and composition are flawless. Sutton provides as much eye candy and he does interview footage. I am no surf historian and cannot vouch for the history laid out in the film, no matter anyway as history is hardly static, especially in surfing. Sutton interviews a broad cast of characters to bring home the bacon. From Rabbit to Dean Morrison and the old Tracks Magazine crew, to Nat and Beau Young and David Rastovich, we see various view points about the controversial subject — is surfing sport? And in true documentary form, Sutton leaves this question up to the viewer to decide.

Cyrus Sutton - 5 overIf you’ve read the latest issue of The Surfers Journal you know that Sutton has had a tough time making this film. He had all of his camera gear stolen —twice! However, his perseverance pays off in the end. The film weaves in and out through time showing us the progression of surfing as well as the progression of the surf industry. Nonetheless, Sutton ends the film with the average surfer in mind. He reminds us why surfing is important and why we devote our lives to it. And in some ways it makes me feel grateful that surfing is not how I make a living. It makes me happy that surfing is a complete distraction from daily life, a distraction that is at once life fulfilling and even spiritual. In a moment of clarity David Rastovich makes a statement that defines and perhaps validates, the selfish pursuit of surfing. David RastovichRastovich wonders out loud about the value of spending his life chasing waves and comes up with a simple self-evident truth. He states, “the joy of the environment is what we’re here for.”

We do not choose where we’re born or what social class we belong to. For those of us lucky enough to pursue surfing as a life long passion, Rastovich’s statement holds a whole heap of meaning. Why wouldn’t we derive joy from our environment? Is it not our responsibility?

Under the Sun is a great film and nothing less. Thanks Cyrus for allowing us to screen it.

For more info please visit:
www.underthesunsurfmovie.com

Check out the trailer for Under the Sun here:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7qHrBWyBVc

• Category: art, interviews

7 Responses »

  1. Now, that sounds like a great movie! Thanks for the review! And for the excellent site.

    All the best,

    Lars
    42 Surfboards
    http://www.42surfboards.blogspot.com

  2. Looks good and I can’t wait.

  3. I can’t wait to get a copy and post it up on Limewire so we can all download it for free.

  4. Hey Paul,

    My old abuelita (grandma), que en paz descanse, used to say:

    “if you don’t have anything nice to say then keep yer mouth shut.”

  5. Why so hostile – I’m just doing my part to end the commodification of surfing.

  6. Hey Paul,

    Perhaps the humour was not obvious in my last remark. However, it should be made clear that the commodification, or corporatization of a culture or movement is different than say, making a film and getting paid for it. Under the Sun discusses the issue of the commercialization of surfing and in order for the filmmaker and his backers to be able to make a film like this they must make revenue to cover their costs and make some profit to pay the bills. What your suggesting is that this piece of work be stolen and given away, at the expense of the filmmaker. This film is the product of two years of hard work from a small group of individuals who’ve given their all to see it come to life. Stealing their work would be akin someone coming and taking your home or car and giving it to someone else. Is this what you are suggesting?

    By ripping off the film you’d be contributing more to the commodification of surfing than fighting against it. Not unlike the way the multinational clothing corporations appropriate the style and trappings of surfing culture and sell it to the masses.

    Cheers,

    RS

  7. Read about the story in the last TSJ. Look forward to watch it soon. The plot sort of reminds me of McCoy film of A.I. “against” Rasta.

    NiegÃ